‘Erasing Hell’ by Francis Chan – Book Review

hell book
In the post ‘Being Sure about Stuff that matters’  I have talked about this book. One of the first things that bothered me about it was that Chan repeatedly said ‘we must be sure about this’ or ‘we cannot afford to be wrong’ about the doctrine of hell. Then, later in the book he wrote about Isaiah 55, ‘Your thoughts are higher than our thoughts’ and reflected that we can never know or fully understand God. Unfortunately, he failed to connect these two thoughts.  Insisting that we ‘must be right’ about a subject as complex as hell, feels not only impossible but maybe somewhat arrogant.

The book reads as if Chan has pulled a concordance off the shelf and gone through all the references to hell, one at a time. (Be reassured, there aren’t that many) He is thorough in this approach but I felt that although he read each text closely, he failed to read the wider context and didn’t put these references into the whole, big story of God.  For example, most of the references to hell come in Matthew’s gospel, there are next to none in the other gospels. It was a pity that Chan never stopped to asked why this was? What was Matthew’s particular point of view? Had he understood that, I think a lot of the references would sound quite different.  He didn’t mention the fact that  Matthew was a Jewish writer, writing for a Jewish audience. This is incredibly relevant. He has either not read, or disagreed with Tom Wright’s How God became King, which is incredibly helpful on how we should hear the four gospels.

Secondly, he makes the assumption that judgement is always a bad thing whereas in the world of the Bible, judgement is always a good thing: the emphasis is on God coming to set things right, much more so than on God coming to condemn, destroy, punish.

Thirdly, he doesn’t seem to see his own assumptions. For example when he talks about the key passage about sheep and goats in Matthew 25 he repeatedly talks about them being divided on the basis of whether or not they ‘believe in Jesus’. That phrase is NOT in that story! And the whole point of that parable is that they are divided on the basis of their actions.  Chan seems to gloss over what the passage actually says.

But my main criticism would be that he doesn’t take into account at all the kind of people we would become were we to think about hell the way he would like us to think about hell. All he says is this doctrine should ‘energise’ us.  In my experience, misunderstanding about this doctrine has made Christians anxious, guilty, over-whelmed, paralysed by fear, much less inclined to love their non Christian friend and much more inclined to withdraw from them.

If what he says is true, then the New Testament should be bulging with commands to go out and evangelise and it’s not. Yes, it talks about making disciples and having an answer but what it bulges with are commands to live loving, humble, kind, generous, patient, non-anxious, quiet, peaceful lives.  I’m not saying evangelism isn’t important. What I am saying is that the more we stress over it, the more we are tempted to think ‘it’s all down to us’ and it isn’t. Our part is to be the people of God, showing what it means to live under the rule of God, being willing and ready to give an answer to why we have hope in a world that often doesn’t look very promising.

I could say a lot more. I wrote pages and pages of notes. But it would only be worth getting into the details with people who have read it (happy to do that). If you do read it, please be sure to get to the FAQs at the end because it’s only there that Chan who has spoken about fire, and worms, darkness and gnashing of teeth in a way that seems very literal, admits that he thinks these are metaphorical.  Personally I think it would have better to have said that upfront.

It is important that any Christian serious about their faith comes to a view about the doctrine of hell but you need to know that this book represents only one view, something Chan himself graciously accepts.  There are a spectrum of other views available put forward by thinkers and theologians with good credentials.  This is a subject we must approach with grace and sensitivity towards others.

5 thoughts on “‘Erasing Hell’ by Francis Chan – Book Review

Add yours

  1. Being brought up in a Baptist church the idea that there was any valid Christian view on Hell that wasn’t ‘fire and brimstone’ never entered my mind. I was ‘saved’ so why should it? But over the years I have realised that that view of hell is based more on medieval superstition than Christianity – it was an easy way for the church to control people.
    A book that helped me immensely was Nigel Wright’s Radical Evangelical; a book that probably should have been read in more Baptist ministers than even looked at it considering he was Principal of Spurgeon’s College at the time.
    Currently I see hell as separation from God; something that I believe we can only do to ourselves. I can’t image the God of Love sustaining people in eternal torment but I can see people rejecting Him (even after death?) and condemning themselves to what Revelation calls the second death. This is now – in 10 years I may have a different view.

    P.S. I have long wondered why no commentator seems to have picked up the presence of 3 groups of people in the parable of the sheep and the goats. Yes there are the sheep and the goats but what about “the least of these brothers and sisters of mine” – who are they? Are they the poor, downtrodden and oppressed who never had a chance?

    1. Hi Hugh, yes I’ve noticed an oversight of the phrase ‘the least of these brothers and sisters of mine’ but one commentator (sorry I can’t remember which one) said Jesus is referring to Christians here, in other words it is Christians who are the hungry, thirsty, naked, imprisoned, therefore judgement is made based on how you treat persecuted Christians. Not sure what I make of this. To be honest my own thoughts on hell are still ‘a work in progress’ but at least I’m identifying the things I disagree with!

      1. Saying “the least of these brothers and sisters of mine” refers to Christians seems a bit of a cop out as it limits God’s love to only Christians.

  2. I have not read Chan’s book but am currently working my way through Rob Bell’s LOVE WINS (which, I’m told, has caused a really big controversy in the USA and Canada). I’m finding it helpful in the questions it raises about Hell, what the Bible says and what we have been taught to assume (not the same thing according to Bell). Sheila, you may find it interesting to make a comparison? I would certainly find it interesting to read your take on Love Wins!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: